Finally, the federal government is moving towards one of the few avenues of resolving the vast foreclosed home crisis. The solution, large scale investor purchase of foreclosed homes and conversion to rental properties. Many of these rental properties will be single family homes. Already the percentage of the US population living in owner-occupied housing has dropped 5% from the peak about 2007 and another 5% shift from owner occupied to rental housing is predicted, bringing the percentage of the population owning versus renting back to historic norms. The number of people involved in such a shift is huge, about 31 million.
The new innovation driven economy demands a highly mobile workforce and that is only going to be possible if many people rent or homes are highly liquid assets and easily sold for purchase price plus transaction costs. The latter certainly is not the case now and nor will it be for the foreseeable future. So the solution is investor purchase of single family homes on a large scale, converting them to rentals in a wide range of prices. This will also allow the US government agencies to dispose of their vast inventory of repossessed properties. Hooray for some pragmatic thinking!
Big investors are showing interest in an evolving Obama
administration plan to sell off foreclosed homes, although the
government will have to make the offer sweet enough to coax
private funds. The White House is assessing how best to
encourage private companies and investors to snap up foreclosed
properties held by the government and convert them into rentals.
Officials want private partners to take over as much as $30
billion in single-family properties that are currently on the
books of government-run Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal
Housing Administration. Several money managers with large fixed
income funds are interested, according to sources, and a request
for ideas on how to construct a program received nearly 4,000
responses. The foreclosure conversion program would come as the
next step to complement other government supports for housing,
including an expanded refinance program announced on Monday.
The main question for prospective investors, which include
broker-dealers and firms already overseeing similar rental
programs, is the type of financing the government will make
available—an issue officials are still struggling with. “In
order to get a better bid, there has to be some incentive
involved to get qualified investors involved,” said Ron D’Vari,
co-founder and chief executive of NewOak Capital. “The reality is
not a lack of interest, but so far it looks like a lack of
financing.” Incentives could include low interest rates, tax
benefits or some type of rental assistance, said D’Vari, a
portfolio adviser who has been involved in mini-bulk auctions of
real estate-owned properties, or REOs, in California. REO
properties are those acquired by a lender, whether a bank or the
government, after an unsuccessful auction attempt. Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and the FHA own about 250,000 properties, close to a
third of the country’s REO pool.
One key challenge would be finding big enough blocks of
properties in specific geographic areas that could be sold at one
time. Analysts say this is what it would take to make the program
attractive to large institutional investors. The transaction and
liability costs property managers will face as they try to bring
deserted units back up to code also pose a hurdle. The
government also needs to determine how it will protect taxpayers,
and it might explore ways to pair up with investors and allow
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA to keep some type of an ownership
stake in the rental properties. A public-private partnership,
somewhat along the lines of a program the Treasury tried to use
to soak up toxic bank assets during the financial crisis, would
allow the government to gain from the sales. Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac and the FHA have already undertaken some small efforts to
reduce the backlog of foreclosed homes. They have donated a few
vacant properties for demolition and have held some small
auctions. Having already received $141 billion in taxpayer
support since being seized by the government in 2008, Fannie Mae
and Freddie are under enormous pressure to make sure they
maximize the returns from the properties they hold. “This has
got to be thought out. Fannie and Freddie would need to assess if
they are getting the return they need from a rental,” said Ken H.
Johnson, a real estate professor at Florida International
University. Johnson said one way to get over the hurdle would be
for the two agencies to be given an explicit mission of market
stabilization.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.